Search for: "Long v. Arnold" Results 81 - 100 of 596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2019, 7:28 am by INFORRM
In support of the first ground, the Claimants relied heavily on Gulati v MGN Ltd [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch), upheld by the Court of Appeal in Representative Claimants v MGN Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1291. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 6:01 am
 Even more so, when the email attaches a judgment that is short and easily digestible, as was the case in Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Napp v Dr Reddy's and Sandoz [2016] EWHC 493. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:42 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
” – Arnold Toynbee McCallister v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:44 am by Brian Cordery
Lilly v Genentech provided Arnold J will the opportunity to consider this issue in the context of two claims of Genentech’s patent to IL-17A/F antibodies. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 8:13 am by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
This would certainly be a record which the Supreme Court would need to reconsider their trilogy of cases which set the cap for damages for pain and suffering back in 1978 (Andrews v Grand and Toy, Teno v Arnold and Thornton v Board of School Trustees) There are deductibles for pain and suffering claims from car accidents in Ontario! [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:25 am by Julius Stobbs (Stobbs IP)
Arnold LJ remarked during the Appeal hearing that “the purpose of sanctions for non-use will be undermined if they can be circumvented by evergreening. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:35 am by Andres
The case was decided in the High Court of England at earlier stages by Arnold J in 2009 (L’Oreal SA & Ors v EBay International AG & Ors [2009] EWHC 1094). [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 6:12 am by Andres
Long-time readers may remember the interesting case of SAS Institute v World Programming (my analysis here), an important software interoperability decision in the UK that got referred to the European Court of Justice. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
Except, devices that people carry around these days have come a long way from the banana-sized box lawyer Johnny Cochran made famous carrying around in the early-to-mid 1990s. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
That was the opening sentence of Mr Justice Arnold's judgment in Interflora, Inc. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm by Henry P Yang
The Judge followed Birss J’s approach to that question in Pfizer v Hoffmann-La Rochebut as Arnold LJ concluded above, helping a foreign court decide an issue under its own law is not a reason to grant declaratory relief ([63] – [64]). [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
In a rather long decision, the Court made some important and potentially far reaching statements regarding the requirements to prove acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Sighted this morning, breaking the surface just off the Strand, the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in MedImmune v Novartis [2011] EWHC 1669 (Pat) certainly fits the legend.In characteristic style, the judgment is as comprehensive as one would wish. [read post]