Search for: "Long v. Carr"
Results 1 - 20
of 290
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2016, 1:18 pm
Following Coflexip SA v Stolt Comex Seaway MS Ltd [2001] 1 All ER 952, Carr J held that the Court has discretion to impose an injunction where it is necessary and appropriate in the circumstances. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 4:13 pm
The interim order was unsuccessfully challenged and Carr was granted an injunction against the press until further notice (Carr v News Group Newspapers [2005] EWHC 971 (QB)). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm
To do so they attempt to distinguish Miami Herald v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:00 am
BAKER v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Lilly accepted there was a long felt want for alternatives, but none of them had been satisfied until Strattera was launched. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Carr and the court-led reapportionment revolution. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
[1] Moody, et al., v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:00 pm
Check the Carr v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 6:38 am
From the 11th yesterday in Trepal v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:56 am
Check the Carr v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 11:30 pm
Summarising the Court of Appeal’s guidance when it applied Budvar, Mr Justice Carr said that honest co-existence for a long period of the same or closely similar names may have to be tolerated. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
Berghuis v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:07 am
There was no period of long-felt want. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 10:55 am
In mid-2017, not long before the trial in one of the ongoing claims, Illumina became aware of a further patent which it wanted to enforce against the same defendants. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court will consider the constitutionality of HB20 in NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 9:50 pm
Mia Carr, writing in the Harvard Crimson, describes one of the weirdest speeches I have read about in a long time -- a complaint that American journalists are too objective. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
The result of cascading divisionals is that the precise scope of patent protection remains obscure, leading to long term commercial uncertainty. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:36 am
A recent Telegraph article on Asbestos claims arising from a landmark legal decision of Sienkiewicz v Greif and Knowsley MBC v Willmore is a case in point. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:09 am
Long Haymes Carr, Inc., The ruling upheld a $1.3 million jury verdict in favor of the Plaintiff, trebled by the Business Court to $3,776,085. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:40 am
" So begins, Carr J's latest trade mark judgment in the English High Court - Pathway IP SARL v Easygroup Ltd [2018] EWHC 3608.This case was a High Court appeal from a successful application by EasyGroup to revoke two trade marks for non-use. [read post]
