Search for: "Long v. Clark" Results 1 - 20 of 1,355
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2023, 10:09 am by Bryan West
Clark Holdings Ltd. v. 1352986 Alberta Ltd., 2023 ABQB 219 appeared first on Construction Law Canada. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
  But we seem to be a long way away from that. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
  But we seem to be a long way away from that. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 4:17 pm
Lewis & Clark Law Review’s latest issue and it features a business forum on the Supreme Court’s recent patent decision in KSR v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:35 am by Alex Wohl
A former Clark law clerk who saw the two men together the same year Miller interviewed Truman recalled, “it was obvious that any disappointment the President may have had with some of Justice Clark’s earlier decisions had long since been forgotten. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 8:39 am by Lawrence Solum
Reuben Clark Law School) has posted Lynch v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 6:03 am
Robert Miller (Lewis and Clark) writes a nice and long post on State of Maine v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:56 am
We grant Clark’s motion to dismiss the appeal because it is frivolous. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm by Don Jacobs
She was the recipient of the Washington State Judge of the Year Award in 2006 by the Washington State Association for Justice, given to her for the important ruling she made in the Clark County civil case of Magana v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:34 pm by Don Jacobs
She was the recipient of the Washington State Judge of the Year Award in 2006 by the Washington State Association for Justice, given to her for the important ruling she made in the Clark County civil case of Magana v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 5:55 am
Sadly, thatmeans that you're subjected today to pure, unadulterated Herrmann.As a defense lawyer, here's a hint that you're just not going to likewhere things are headed: When six of the first seven pages of ajudge's decision in a civil case consist of a long block quote from acriminal information to which your client previously pled guilty.That's what happened in Clark v. [read post]