Search for: "Long v. Commissioner of IRS"
Results 1 - 20
of 226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 2:56 pm
Commissioner, 76 T.C.M. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:01 pm
The IRS has long held the position that partners are not employees for purposes of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA), Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA), or withholding, and that partners cannot have dual status as a partner and an employee [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
December 18, 2023 Clients, Friends, and Associates: As we near the end of 2023, we have highlighted some recent industry developments that will likely impact many of our clients. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:06 am
Commissioner, T.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 8:34 am
Commissioner, T.C. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am
For example, section 501(c)(3) organizations are allowed to lobby so long as lobbying activity is not a substantial part of their activities. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
After a long and distinguished career as a popular public servant, first as a councillor, then then as a TD, and finally as a Minister, Pat Carey is now a public affairs consultant. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
For example, foreign-based energy companies operating in Louisiana, who may have subsidiaries, stakes in joint ventures, or other interests in countries such as Russia or Venezuela, could technically be “subject to the[ir] jurisdiction” and would not be allowed to purchase or lease office space in the state under the introduced version. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Part of Just Security’s work on accountability and election law. [read post]
8 May 2023, 1:54 pm
§ 6501(a), Crim argued that the IRS waited too long – seven years, in fact – to penalize him. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
Commissioner,[28] the court found that the taxpayer was violating the no private benefits provision when it primarily served one political party over the other, and the evidence lacked in trying to be nonpartisan. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Davis discussed the end of U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Commissioner. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:55 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:55 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
