Search for: "Long v. Levinson"
Results 41 - 60
of 245
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
So long as the South remained a one-party region and the black vote was effectively suppressed, the principled incentive to use either district-based or proportional schemes in other states was diminished. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
Not long after posting about spam, I picked up (via the Tech News Review feed) this story from Friday’s Times, a report of a case (Microsoft v McDonald, 12 December 2006, Levinson J in the High Court, Chancery) from the tail end of 2006…where Microsoft took on the spammers and…well, IPKat has a good summary, so over to them: Microsoft normally protected Hotmail subscribers against spam by setting up its own ‘target accounts’, which it used as… [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Comparative Constitutional Design, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 10:02 am
The list of significant contheory books not reviewed in MLR has become quite long. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 9:10 pm
Sentence Affirmed: In United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Civic Education, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
15 May 2008, 9:28 am
As Levinson noted, there is very little evidence to support such an assumption. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:04 am
Circuit — Tuaua v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Voting Rights, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:02 am
Jalbert v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Constitutional Faith and Veneration, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
[5] Roe v Wade 410 US 113 (1973) [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 8:15 pm
In Friend v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 4:12 pm
Bruce Ackerman and Sandy Levinson were important here. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:01 pm
As long as the state follows the “simple rules” that someone like Richard Epstein articulates, distributive questions are solely answered by the market. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:22 am
Hood v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 9:19 am
Hood v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
Gloss, and reaffirmed its holding two decades later in Coleman v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 10:25 am
Levinson but did not participate in the decision. [read post]
