Search for: "Long v. People's Department Store"
Results 81 - 100
of 616
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2022, 8:12 am
To set the stage, Epic v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
At least 147 people were sickened and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 10:01 pm
FSIS would also begin a new sampling program by testing raw ground beef in grocery stores for E. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:46 am
(Decision and Order, Sept. 17, 2008 at 67.) -=-=-=-=- And it’s just a slap in the face for the Appellate Division to cite to People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 10:49 am
There is no doubt, we argue, that people’s long-term physical movements, even in public places, enjoy constitutional protection. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:46 am
The opinion, People v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
Before proceeding to phone it in flagrantly, let me pause just long enough to note that with the Supreme Court putting partisan-gerrymander case Gill v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 12:52 pm
We will be arguing Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 4:25 am
This has been a long-standing principle in New York, which was first clearly stated in a 1959 Court of Appeals (NY's highest Court) case People v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:51 am
People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 2:35 pm
It may be stored but not indexed. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Although U.S. surveillance prohibitions turn on the location of the interception or stored data, the U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:09 am
Common sense tells us that an arrest or conviction may become general knowledge within a community and that people will not banish from their memories stored knowledge even if they become aware of an expungement order. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 4:19 pm
This map was a powerful evidentiary component which led to the Defendant's conviction.Although prior SCOTUS rulings have held that motorists do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy as to their driving movements, Justice Roberts held that people do not expect that the police are tracking their every move over a long period of time. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm
., v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 9:08 pm
In the Eleventh Circuit case, Gil v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 4:00 am
Users of text-messaging services “have a reasonable expectation of privacy” regarding messages stored on the service provider’s network, 9th Circuit Judge Kim Wardlaw said in Quon v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 3:55 am
According to People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm
Today, people's reasonable expectations are different than in 1967, when the high court placed so much import on the fact that Mr. [read post]
