Search for: "Long v. Powell"
Results 1 - 20
of 622
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2009, 11:26 am
But I do not see Powell v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:54 am
Before his tenure on the Supreme Court, Powell was a long time corporate lawyer who represented the tobacco industry among other business interests. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
Sullivan; therefore, so long as that precedent remains on the books, Powell is as entitled as anyone to rely on it. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 11:27 am
Courts have repeatedly recognized that "enforcement of an IRS summons does not violate the fourth amendment as long as the IRS has complied with the Powell requirements. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in Powell v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:37 am
This decision is the long awaited sequel to Manchester CC v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2010] 3 WLR 1441 (case comment here) where a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court held (in the context of demoted tenancies under the Housing Act 1996, Pt V, Ch 1A) that where a local authority bring possession proceedings relying [...] [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:12 am
I mean: LONG. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:55 pm
Perhaps the most infamous example of how corporate power has been advanced through the strategies seeded by Powell is last year’s Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 8:28 am
Powell. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 4:01 pm
 Check the Florida v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
This point is demonstrated in a recent case, Powell v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 5:39 pm
Sundby (University of Miami School of Law) has posted The Loss of Constitutional Faith: McClesky v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:15 pm
Long protective weapons search is not barred by Arizona v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
Powell and Hertz Corp. v Friend, and it heard oral argument in Holder v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 2:19 pm
In Florida v Powell, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Police need not stick to a script when providing a suspect with Miranda rights. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:05 am
’ I say this only to emphasize that I am not particularly invested in the outcome of the ‘2 v. 3’ debate. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 4:50 pm
From Powell v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 5:25 pm
That conclusion appears to rest mainly on one precedent: the Supreme Court’s decision in Powell v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
Powell, 08-1175). [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 10:23 am
Powell, 469 U.S. 57, 61-69 (1984). [read post]
