Search for: "Long v. Richmond et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
But here's what you can do, and we promise it'll make you feel better: Pick a local agency—it could be a city council, a sheriff's office or state department of natural resources—and send them an email demanding their public record-request log, or any other record showing what requests they receive, how long it took them to respond, whether they turned over records, and how much they charged the requester for copies. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
This admission goes a long way to support our conclusion: the meaning of "officers of the United States" did not drift from 1788 to 1868. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
11 May 2023, 10:50 am
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland et al.? [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 11:38 am
” The case is Garcia, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 1:29 pm
Thomas James (“The Cokato Copyright Attorney”) explains how Hachette Book Group et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 1:29 pm
Thomas James (“The Cokato Copyright Attorney”) explains how Hachette Book Group et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am
In Dickson v Forney Enterprises, Inc. et. al., the Court looked at the question of whether costs of a project manager’s purely clerical duties can be included and correspondingly whether performing those duties can extend the relevant one-year limitations period for filing suit. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am
In Dickson v Forney Enterprises, Inc. et. al., the Court looked at the question of whether costs of a project manager’s purely clerical duties can be included and correspondingly whether performing those duties can extend the relevant one-year limitations period for filing suit. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Donald Glaser et al., 937 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2019), on remand, 2020 U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
USDA will have a day-long workshop on the ReConnect program in Casper, WY on October 10, 2019 (registration link). [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
Richmond Hill, 1995) This principle is affirmed in Nelson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 12:21 am
DUFFY, JJ.2016-09188 (Index No. 32465/09) Gail Arroyo, appellant, vCentral Islip UFSD, et al., respondents, et al., defendants.Law Offices of Wayne J. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 8:18 pm
One of the earliest cases to lay out the elements of the tort of harassment is in the 2006 B.C. case of Mainland Sawmills Ltd. et al v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:38 am
(United States, et al., v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
Penn Lyon Homes, et. al., No. 07-2171 are as follows. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Goldberg et al. eds., 2011), Reference Area(KF8205.A2 I535 2011). [read post]
