Search for: "Long v. Richmond et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 8:10 am
Thomas Rutherfoord, Inc., et al. [read post]
11 May 2012, 6:00 am
The first is a Virginia Supreme Court case, Dunn Construction Company, Inc. et. al. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
City of Richmond (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 305: A municipal services agreement between the Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians of California and the City of Richmond did not constitute a project for the purposes of CEQA. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am
In Dickson v Forney Enterprises, Inc. et. al., the Court looked at the question of whether costs of a project manager’s purely clerical duties can be included and correspondingly whether performing those duties can extend the relevant one-year limitations period for filing suit. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am
In Dickson v Forney Enterprises, Inc. et. al., the Court looked at the question of whether costs of a project manager’s purely clerical duties can be included and correspondingly whether performing those duties can extend the relevant one-year limitations period for filing suit. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:02 pm
Cir. 404 (2005); and, Estes Express Lines, et al v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Donald Glaser et al., 937 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2019), on remand, 2020 U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:27 am
Matthews et al., State-by-State Report on Permanent Public Access to Electronic Government Information 2 (Chicago: IL: American Association of Law Libraries, 2003). [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Desmarais was mentioned in “Long-Term Sluggers,” also a feature on Kirkland as a 2003 IP Litigation Department of the Year finalist. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 6:52 am
Richmond Hills Residential Partners, LLC et al., discusses the majority and dissenting opinions, and comments on the important points to take away from the decision. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
But here's what you can do, and we promise it'll make you feel better: Pick a local agency—it could be a city council, a sheriff's office or state department of natural resources—and send them an email demanding their public record-request log, or any other record showing what requests they receive, how long it took them to respond, whether they turned over records, and how much they charged the requester for copies. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Background: Public Resources Code section 5003.03 was enacted in 1992 to require the Park District to provide for a shoreline park and bay trail along the east shore of the San Francisco Bay from the Bay ridge to the Marina Bay Trail in Richmond. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm
In February of this year, the Administration filed its brief in the Fourth Circuit Court in Richmond, Va. — in the case that had come up from the federal judge in Lynchburg (in the Liberty University v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm
Using their Medicaid benefits to cover the costs, the Medicaid beneficiaries filled prescriptions for month-long supplies of drugs at pharmacies throughout the New York City area and then sold them to "collectors" for cash instead of using them for treatment. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:30 am
V. [read post]
