Search for: "Long v. United States Department of Defense"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2016, 9:31 am
Lockheed Martin Corporation, one of the largest defense contractors in the United States, operated three California facilities that manufactured solid-propellant rockets for the United States Department of Defense pursuant to contracts subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulations. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:14 am
McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984); United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 5:55 am
In July of 2014, De La Roca took H.C. to the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:19 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 9:37 am
United States, which is being argued on Jan. 17. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 4:24 pm
In State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:08 am
As we reported, on June 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Lucia v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:54 am
United States and Ortiz v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 17–1618. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 17–1618. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:54 pm
With a new judge presiding, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:00 pm
From there, detectives with the department's narcotics unit decided to open the package, based on its smell. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 10:38 am
, United States v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:40 am
Anetta and the children were currently residing in the United States on F1 non-immigrant visas, which allowed them to remain in the United States as long as Anetta remained in school. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:43 am
Anetta and the children were currently residing in the United States on F1 non-immigrant visas, which allowed them to remain in the United States as long as Anetta remained in school. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:53 am
Torres, and the United States as amicus curiae, argue that the states did so. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
United States, 509 U. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:04 pm
Under New York's rules of precedent, a decision by one department of the Appellate Division is a state-wide precedent binding on all trial courts so long as it is not contradicted by another panel of the Appellate Division or overruled by the Court of Appeals. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 2:33 pm
United States Department of the Interior (Land into Trust)Sturgeon v. [read post]
