Search for: "Lopez v. City of Los Angeles" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2009, 11:15 pm
On Wednesday, a student at Los Angeles City College filed a federal court lawsuit against a speech professor John Matteson, and against the trustees and various administrators at the College. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 9:02 am
Philadelphia is fast surpassing Los Angeles as the last city in America where a law-abiding citizen would want to encounter a cop. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 11:41 am by Margaret Wood
He is a Los Angeles-based artist, who has been illustrating trials for more than four decades. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 4:50 pm by Kali Borkoski
Commentary comes from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, German Lopez at Vox, and Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:21 pm by CJLF Staff
District Judge Cormac Carney concluded in the case of Jones v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:57 pm by Brad Pauley
City of Los Angeles, S195080—Review Denied [Kennard and Liu, JJ., voting for review]—September 28, 2011 This was a negligence and wrongful death action against a city by a deceased child’s mother. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
(the link is to the decision that is being appealed), and my students Nathan Davis, Sara Liss, and Paulette Rodriguez-Lopez worked on the brief. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Lopez-DeLeon, No. 06-41553 A sentence for illegal reentry is affirmed where defendant's prior California conviction for sexual intercourse with a minor qualified as a "crime of violence" within section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, as documents established that the victim in that matter was under the age of 14. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
City of Los Angeles, No. 06-55817 In a civil rights action against the City of Los Angeles, the LAPD, and four detectives arising from plaintiff's arrest on murder charges and 162 days of incarceration prior to his release, rulings in favor of defendants are affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) dismissal of plaintiffs' case against one detective and of plaintiffs section 1983 claim against another detective was proper; but 2)… [read post]