Search for: "Lopez v. Gonzales" Results 41 - 60 of 199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2008, 2:53 pm
(stating that a "discrepancy between documents and a driver's explanation is a legitimate basis for suspicion"); Gonzales was not present and neither Loya or Lopez knew where Gonzales was; Lopez had no identification; and Loya appeared nervous. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 1:39 pm by Ann Bartow
Miami lawyers from our new Human Rights Clinic won a major moral victory for their client Jessica Lenahan (formerly formerly Jessica Gonzales) in a decision announcedtoday July 21, 2011 by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Jessica Lenahan (Gonzales) v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 10:15 am
One day after our panel opinion was filed, our en banc court decided Navarro-Lopez v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 5:17 pm
And in the concluding paragraph of his opinion for the Court in Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:31 pm by Karen Hoffmann
In 2011, the Commission decided Jessica Lenahan (Gonzales) v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
"The court also considered, and rejected, two novel arguments.First, Wallace cited Lopez v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:55 am by Big Tent Democrat
568. - Justice Scalia in concurrence in Gonzales v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 9:12 am by José Guillermo
En facebook se visualiza un vídeo en el que el candidato López Aliaga declara que lo apoyemos y a sus ciento sesenta amigos que "NO tienen un pasado vergonzoso", ESTÁN LIBRES DE CORRUPCIÓN al igual que él, siempre, naturalmente, por su propio dicho.Cómo no puedo compartir el vídeo de Wash, ni opinar en facebook, por haber expresado lo que siento por un impresentable y la vergüenza de pertenecer a la raza humana de la… [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:48 am by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) I was going to write a post suggesting that Roberts’s vote may have come out the other way if Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 10:37 pm
  Unfortunately, Lopez is an irrelevant Commerce Clause case, especially in light of Gonzales v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:40 pm by Jason Mazzone
Though Judge Hudson doesn’t mention it, his opinion hews closely to Scalia’s concurring opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]