Search for: "Lopez v. Power"
Results 141 - 160
of 577
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2018, 4:08 pm
Lopez, 514 U.S. at 561. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:08 pm
Lopez, 514 U.S. at 561. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:33 am
(the trade or exchange of a good, see Gibbons v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 1:13 pm
If you take that view, then once you have analyzed the individual mandate under existing Commerce Clause doctrine, you’re basically done: There is no more added power under the Necessary and Proper Clause, as the Lopez test has already factored in that power. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 4:30 am
Andrea Lopez and Sam Rabin then took on the case with the unenviable task of filing a motion for reconsideration.They were successful: Judge Altonaga found that potential legal flaws with Mr. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:50 pm
Powers, 544 F.Supp.2d 1331 (M.D. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:47 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has issued its ruling in Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:32 am
Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 558 (1995).The CAFC observed that its prior rulings in "use in commerce" cases reflect the broad scope of Congress’s Commerce Clause powers. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Lopez was decided. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:52 am
Filburn and Gonzales v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 8:34 am
Even if Roe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:31 pm
The unanimous opinion in Bond v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 2:45 am
Lopez, Gonzalez v. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 6:50 am
That would mean that Gibbons v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm
A. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
The two most enlightening ones are his concurrence in US v Lopez and his dissent in Gonzales v Raich. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:52 am
As Gonzales v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 3:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
