Search for: "Lord v. Lord" Results 181 - 200 of 6,605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2021, 4:19 am
Royal Courts of JusticeAuthor Aurelien Guichard Licence CC BY-SA 2,0 Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lord Justice Lewison, Lady Justice Asplin and Lord Justice Arnold) Travel Counsellors Ltd v Trailfinders Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 38 (19 Jan 2021)This was an appeal by Travel Counsellors Ltd ("TCL") against the judgment of His Honour Judge Hacon in Trailfinders Ltd v Travel Counsellors Ltd and others [ [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:26 am by Dave
I've got parental duty so can't do a full note on Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 now. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:26 am by Dave
I've got parental duty so can't do a full note on Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 now. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am by Jan von Hein
Lord Mance stressed that the so-called Miller decisions of the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State [2017] UKSC 5 and R (Miller) v The Prime Minister, Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland (Miller II) [2019] UKSC 41, dealing with the parliamentary procedure of the withdrawal from the EU, are extraordinary regarding the degree of judicial activism from a British point of view. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 10:37 am
Not for the first time, Nearly Legal has drawn my attention to the case of Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames, this time as it reaches the House of Lords. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by JONATHAN GLASSON QC, MATRIX
In March 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes) heard the appeal of the Metropolitan Police Service (“MPS”) in the case of Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v DSD & Anor. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 9:21 am
Courtesy of ProfessorBainbridge.com, here are a few excerpts from the Chancery Court's findings of fact:Hollinger Intern., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Jack Kennedy, Olswang LLP
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Anisminic… [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 3:40 am
Previously, abuse claimants had 6 years to bring an action but the Lords in A v Hoare decided that this was wrongly imposed. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:34 am
Two appeals are listed in the Supreme Court this week with R v F and R v M being heard by Lords Hope, Rodger and Walker, Lady Hale and Lord Brown on Monday 6 December. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 1:08 am
Ashley and Another v Chief Constable of Sussex Police House of Lords “A civil claim against the police for assault and battery by the family of an unarmed man shot dead during a police raid was not to be struck out despite the responsible officer's acquittal of murder because, in civil law, a plea of mistaken self-defence required not only that the assailant's mistaken belief that he had been under threat had been honestly held, as required by the criminal law,… [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:53 am
Housing associations, in particular Riverside Housing Association, will have been popping champagne corks recently, to celebrate the result of the recent House of Lords decision in the case of Riverside Housing Association v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 5:50 am
Author The Lud Licence Copyright waiver Jane LambertChancery Division (Lord Justice Warby) Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] EWHC 1245 (Ch) (12 May 2021)At a directions hearing before Lord Justice Warby on 5 May 2021, His Lordship granted summary judgment to the Duchess of Cambridge in her claim for copyright infringement against the publisher of The Mail on Sunday and The Mail [read post]