Search for: "Lord v. Lord"
Results 81 - 100
of 6,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm
Cramer v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:40 am
On 21 December, however, a Home Office minister, Lord Sharpe of Epsom, announced in a Lords Written Answer that the raising of the income threshold will be staged, starting with an increase to £29,000 in the spring, and that was confirmed in a Home Office policy paper published on the same day. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
Perhaps more interestingly, and certainly to me at the time, it was when the defendant distributors tried to strike out his libel claim against them on the grounds of abuse of process (Goldsmith v Sperring [1977] EWCA Civ J0223-1) in the appeal presided over by Lord Denning MR that Bridge LJ, with whom Scarman LJ expressly agreed, publicly chastised the Master of the Rolls as follows: “The Legal Liability of the Distributors. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 10:53 am
by Dennis Crouch Thaler v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
Sir Richard Arnold, Lord Justice of Appeal, and will summarise the key provisions in REULA, highlight its potential implications for the main IP rights, and review the main opportunities for law reform in this area. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
By Lauren Gowler Picture this. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 am
” The trial Judge’s decision was based on various authorities, from Fielding v Variety Inc [1967] 2 QB 841 (CA) to BHX v GRX [2021] EWHC 770 (QB), and the lower court ultimately dismissed the libel and slander claims for want of serious harm. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Carly Forrest et al, Lexology: Vicarious Liability in Scotland – the retreat continues: on the recent Inner House judgment in C & S v Shaw and Live Active Leisure [2023] CSIH 36. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 8:13 pm
In any case, Price v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:47 pm
Lundbeck A/S v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Sattva Capital Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm
R (UNISON) v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Lights of New York, the first all-talking full-length feature film, will also enter the U.S. public domain in 2024, as will Edgar Rice Burroughs’ novel Tarzan, Lord of the Jungle, and Wanda Gág’s Millions of Cats, which is the oldest American picture book still in print. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Particular care is required before deploying it, as Lord Sales’s analysis in R (Imam) v London Borough of Croydon [2023] UKSC 45 amply demonstrates. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
The Data Protection and Digital Information Bill has passed through the House of Commons and will now proceed to the House of Lords for consideration. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm
The Supreme Court, in Lord Sales judgment, restates the starting position, as per R v East Sussex County Council, Ex p Tandy (1998) AC 714, that where Parliament imposes a statutory duty on a public authority to provide a specific benefit or service, it does so on the footing that the authority must be taken to have the resources available to comply with that duty. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 8:00 am
The working group will also hear a presentation comparing the privacy risks of legacy v. non-legacy systems. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
