Search for: "Lord v. Lord"
Results 121 - 140
of 6,604
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
On 1 and 2 November 2023, the UK Supreme court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
.# # #DECISIONC. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 11:58 am
In the course of submissions Lord Justice Lewison gave an example of a person who was driving a car, which was the use of the car, but the purpose of driving it was to decide whether to purchase it. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm
” Davidoff & Ors v (i) Dhir Doshi and (ii) Thomas Govan [Claim No. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On 17 and 18 October 2023, the UK Supreme Court (Lords Hodge, Hamblen, Leggatt, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of George v Cannell. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:01 pm
, which prompted lower-level noblemen and lords to more or less force the king, under threat of war, into signing what was essentially a declaration of rights and an admission to the limits of his own power. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
The Office of Parliamentary Counsel was established in 1869 under Lord Thring, who in 1887 published a treatise on legislative drafting entitled Practical Legislation.10 It set out rules for arranging the contents of legislation and for drafting sentences and particular types of provisions. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
In Re D [2008] 1 WLR 1499 at [27] Lord Carswell approved what had been said by Richards LJ in R (N) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Region) [2006] QB 468 at [62] who had said, ‘Although there is a single civil standard of proof on the balance of probabilities, it is flexible in its application. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 9:31 am
Oday Yabari, R (on the application of) v The Lord Mayor and Citizens of the City of Westminster (2023) EWHC 185 (Admin) A judicial review of what was alleged to be Westminster’s failure to meet its s.188(1) duty to secure suitable accommodation and breach of Public Sector Equality Duty. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 4:41 pm
Author Billreid Licence CC BY-SA 3.0 Deed Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertPuter House, Court of Session (Lord Braid) D & M Winchester Ltd. v Coleburn Distillery Ltd [2023] ScotCS CSOH_66, [2023] CSOH 66This was an appeal by D & M Winchester Ltd. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm
” Except that Lord Judge was never actually known as “Judge Judge”: he began his judicial career as Mr Justice Judge – which is not quite the same thing. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
See also South Hetton Coal Co v North-Eastern News Association [1894] 1 QB 133; Jones v Halton [1909] 2 KB 444; Browne v DC Thomson & Co [1912] SC 359; Irish People’s Assurance Society v City of Dublin Assurance Company Ltd [1929] IR 25 (SC); Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1944] AC 116, [1944] UKHL 1 (03 April 1944); Awolowo v Zik Enterprises Ltd [1958] UKPC… [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
In accepting this justification for deference, the court was in this regard ostensibly influenced by the British House of Lords judgment in R (on the application of ProLife Alliance) v British Broadcasting Corporation. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:03 pm
For example, in the 1914 case Harris v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
In the recent UK Supreme Court decision O (a minor), R (on the application of v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKSC 3, Lord Hodge provided a pithy statement of the approach of the courts in that jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 1:32 am
Rabiat Akande & Faisal Bhabha, Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper: Insulating the Church: Ethiopian Orthodox Church of Canada v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 2:52 am
Amgen v Sanofi, IPKat). [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 8:20 am
Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill was read the third time in the House of Lords on Thursday. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:06 pm
It is difficult to align the interpretation of G 2/21 by Lord Justice Arnold in Sandoz v BMS with the Board of Appeal decision in T 0116/18 reported in the minutes of oral proceedings. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
As I read an appellate opinion about the illegal public adjuster contract, which went viral a day later,1 I kept thinking about how this entire scenario could easily have been avoided. [read post]
