Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,022
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2024, 9:16 am
Lord Hodge who gave the only judgment (with which Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Leggatt, Lord Burrows and Lady Rose agreed) stated (at [33]): “.. the purpose of section 471(3) is to circumvent the difficult issues that can arise in the application of section 471(1). [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am
On 8 January 2024, the High Court of Northern Ireland handed down judgment in the case of Kelly v O’Doherty [2024] NIMaster 1 [pdf]. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:22 am
As Lord Kitchin stated, Dr. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:20 am
The provisional view of Hodge Ch communicated to the objectors stated: “[13]. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
The Bill is currently in the Committee Stage of the House of Lords after its second reading on 19 December 2023. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
He comes, my lord. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:11 am
Part IV of the Declaration stated: “beyond the guidance provided above, no further responses should be expected about possible ways to regulate details or practicalities regarding blessings of this type” (paragraph 41)”. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
Lord and undeposable ruler, perfection in the house of wisdom, Lord infinite in knowledge, we who fail to know you fully will fail, if we could but know you fully, all would be well with us.] [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm
Cramer v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:40 am
Simon Hoare, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (and, we learned, the Government’s Minister for Faith), replied. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
Secondly, it claims, in effect, that the Master of the Rolls’ private researches demonstrates the law, as stated in the leading text book, to be not only wrong but unarguable. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 10:53 am
As Lord Kitchin stated, Dr. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
This limited release of information is to ensure the art market’s understanding and acceptance of the final determination.[16] The most famous art arbitration concerned Maria Altmann and her efforts to recover six Gustav Klimt paintings from the Republic of Austria.[17] These paintings originally belonged to her uncle and aunt but were confiscated by the Nazis in 1938, eventually ending up in the Austrian State Gallery in Vienna. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 am
” The trial Judge’s decision was based on various authorities, from Fielding v Variety Inc [1967] 2 QB 841 (CA) to BHX v GRX [2021] EWHC 770 (QB), and the lower court ultimately dismissed the libel and slander claims for want of serious harm. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Carly Forrest et al, Lexology: Vicarious Liability in Scotland – the retreat continues: on the recent Inner House judgment in C & S v Shaw and Live Active Leisure [2023] CSIH 36. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 8:13 pm
In any case, Price v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
