Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 4,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2007, 12:29 am
Press), examines the 1963 case, Abington v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 2:27 am
Successor to polluter not liable under later law Regina (National Grid Gas plc) v Environment Agency House of Lords “A private company which had succeeded the state-owned British Gas in 1986 was not liable under legislation enacted in 1995 for the cost of removing contamination from land at a former gasworks which had been sold for housing in 1965. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
In Dover District Council v CPRE Kent [2017] UKSC 79, Lord Carnwath offered some important observations on the duty to give reasons in administrative law. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:56 am
He says that is not something on which there is a margin of appreciation to the state. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am
” (iv) Financial Independence and s 117B(3) Characterising Ms Rhuppiah’s case as “a good example of the sometimes flimsy distinction between employment and third party support”, Lord Wilson took the view that “financial independence” in s 117B(3) means an absence of financial dependence upon the state. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:54 pm
The panel will be Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Carnwarth, Tolson and Hodge. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 4:12 am
Most of the media attention, if the judgments get any attention on budget day, will be on Norris v United States, the extradition case in [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
Lord Lloyd-Jones found that B’s situation fell into the category of case Lord Dyson had in mind in Lumba where a person’s detention pending deportation ceases to be lawful no matter how grave the risk of absconding or the risk of serious offending. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:11 am
Lord Justice ThorpeThe case of Lawrence v Gallagher [2012] EWCA Civ 394, decided today, has caused a number of headlines, primarily because it is said to be the first substantial appeal concerning financial orders made following the dissolution of a Civil Partnership. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:06 pm
As is well known, the House of Lords in Stack v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:33 am
The post Case Preview: Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:45 am
On 23 November 2015 the Supreme Court heard a two day appeal of the decision in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 1608. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 3:04 am
Secretary of State for Health & Others Lord Chancellor v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 10:50 am
On 23 May 2019, HM Treasury published a letter from John Glen MP (Economic Secretary to the Treasury) to Lord Boswell (Chair, House of Lords’ European Union Committee) providing further clarification on the remuneration proposals developed in the Capital Requirements Directive V (CRD V). [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
This will be heard by Lord Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:54 am
The case caused a furore as the former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey submitted a witness statement stating that cases such of these should be heard by judges with special religious sensitivity. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm
As predicted by various commentators giving a preview of the case (including in my previous post), the five Supreme Court judges (Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs) clarified the applicable law, but unanimously dismissed the appeals against the Court of Appeal decision ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334) on the facts. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:07 am
Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath dissented. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:52 am
In November 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Lloyd-Jones) will hear this appeal relating to the lawfulness of the disclosure of a rape acquittal on an Enhanced Criminal Records Check (‘ECRC’). [read post]
