Search for: "Lord v. State -"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
The Court of Appeal was bound by the decisions in Zalewska v Department for Social Development [2008] UKHL 67; [2008] 1 WLR 2602 and Kaczmarek v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWCA Civ 1310; [2009] PTSR 897. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:17 am
The “Explanatory Notes” to Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill have been made available. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
In March 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes) heard the appeal of the Metropolitan Police Service (“MPS”) in the case of Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v DSD & Anor. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:50 am
Zalewska v Department for Social Development House of Lords “The United Kingdom's decision to restrict the payment of welfare benefits for nationals of Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Slovenia, Slovakia and the Czech Republic, known collectively as the A8 states, to those who had worked an uninterrupted 12 months in employment registered with the Home Office was not incompatible with European Union law. [read post]
8 May 2007, 3:01 am
Reasonable notice is required for rent rise in wrong month Riverside Housing Association Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:09 am
R (Binyan Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] EWHC 2048 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 295 “The principles set out by the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133 could be applied in novel circumstances to require the Foreign Secretary to disclose information, specific to the claimant and essential to his defence to serious charges which might carry the death penalty, in… [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 1:15 am
The post Case Preview: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:31 am
Van Colle and Another v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Constabulary House of Lords “The test for considering whether the state had violated its obligation to protect life under article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights was stringent and remained constant; no lower standard applied where the threat to an individual's life arose from the state's decision to call him as a witness. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
KS v R [2010] EWCA Crim 1756 (23 July 2010) – Read judgment J, S, M v R [2010] EWCA Crim 1755 – Read judgment The Lord Chief Justice has emphasised in two Court of Appeal judgments that the jury-less trials must be a last resort and take place only in truly extreme cases. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
The lead judgment was given by Lady Hale, with Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Reed unanimously agreeing with her findings. [read post]
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
A brief note on the recent House of Lords decision in the case of Jones v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:18 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 to 18 January 2011 Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear Duncombe and others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:19 am
There only one case listed in the Supreme Court this week: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:18 pm
Beast Six Six Six Lord v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:30 pm
Lord Camden ruled firmly in Entick’s favour, holding that the warrant of a Secretary of State could not render lawful actions such as these which were otherwise unlawful.The case is a canonical statement of the common law’s commitment to the constitutional principle of the rule of law. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes agreed with Lady Hale. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Kerr is critical of affording the state a margin of appreciation where it has not properly evaluated the issues at stake. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
This was certainly the stated view of Mrs Stocker after court. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 2:27 pm
Click Here for PDF In Richards v. [read post]
