Search for: "Lord v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2010, 1:28 pm
(Gantman, J., dissenting).In its non-precedential opinion, the Superior Court quoted extensively from the case Mull v. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am
Yet since Lord Hain chose to breach the court injunction issued by the Court of Appeal in ABC v Telegraph Group plc by hiding behind Parliamentary privilege, this is exactly what the public does not get to do. [read post]
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
A brief note on the recent House of Lords decision in the case of Jones v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am
The post The Quebec Superior Court declines to issue a Norwich order to identify the supplier of grey market perfumes appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am
The post The Quebec Superior Court declines to issue a Norwich order to identify the supplier of grey market perfumes appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:46 pm
In Lord v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:10 am
Law The House of Lord decisions in: Clarke v Edinburgh & District Tramways Co Ltd 1919 SC HL 35 and Thomas v Thomas 1947 SC (HL) 45 establish that a trial judge is in a superior position, having seen and heard the witnesses, to form a conclusion as to the credibility and reliability of those witnesses. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 1:44 am
Lords Valley Xtra Mart, No. 1358-2006-Civil (June 19, 2009).Relying upon, Rocklin v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 3:47 pm
Superior Court (Kimco) (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 225 (review denied), the Third Division disregarded a discussion in Murphy v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 3:09 am
The Supreme Court’s unanimous judgment specifies the circumstances in which the JCPC can decide that the earlier House of Lords or Supreme Court decision was wrong. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:10 am
Dr Singh appealed to the Court of Appeal, and Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Lord Justice Sedley were asked to rule on the preliminary points relating to possible defences. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:00 pm
In Canada, in 2002 and 2004, the Ontario Superior Court and the Ontario Court of Appeal in Bouzari v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:42 pm
Tumey v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:15 am
But in this connection, let us turn to the case of Hirst v United Kingdom No2 (the prisoner voting case). [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
The Inner House (The Lord President (Hamilton), Lords Kingarth and Brodie)’s judgment began familiarly enough: the Upper Tribunal was found to be inferior to the Court of Session and, irrespective of the fact the Upper Tribunal might in some circumstances exercise a judicial review function, the only civil courts in Scotland which the Court of Session had regarded as not amenable to judicial review were those which were an alter ego or manifestation… [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:59 am
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division: J.T. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 4:56 am
In Starbucks v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am
Lord Brodie – Prosecutors lied to obtain warrant. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd., [2001] 1 All E.R. 700 (H.L.), at p. 706, per Lord Hoffmann; see also Nichols v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
This moggy, by contrast, has just published a rather polemical article in the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, whose controversial thesis is that non-specialist superior courts can not in general be trusted with patent matters. [read post]
