Search for: "Lords Construction Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2018, 2:37 am
Royal Courts of Justice Author Anthony MLicence Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 genericSource Wikimedia Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lord Kitchin, Lord Justice Floyd and Sir Colin Rimer) Argos Ltd. v Argos Systems Inc. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
In Lord-N-Fields Voice of Freedom Bible Church Community Workers Intl., Inc. v Kwan, (Sup. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:18 am
Champlain Oil Co., Inc., 99 N.H. 451, 453 (1955). [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:21 am
Lord, Williston on Contracts § 70:219 (4th ed. 1990). [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 8:43 am by CMS
In this post, Shona McCusker and Amy Roberts, who work within the construction disputes team at CMS, review the appeal decision published on 16 July 2021 by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd [2021] UKSC 29, which concerns liquidated damages for delayed works and limitations of liability. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 6:03 am by CMS
In this post, Shona McCusker and Jennifer Wilson, who both work within the construction disputes team at CMS, preview the decision awaited from the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd, which concerns liquidated damages for delayed works and limitations of liability. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:57 am by Sally-Ann Underhill
As a matter of precedent, however, the court found that it was bound by the decision of the House of Lords in Hain Steamship v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:39 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
App. 1921) (where the failure was the installation in a country residence of pipe which was of identical quality but a different brand than the contractually specified pipe) and the House of Lords in Ruxley Electronics & Construction Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Triple Point commenced proceedings in the Technology and Construction Court to recover outstanding sums on unpaid invoices. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 4:46 pm
But he can use prior art to support a narrow claim construction—to “construe and narrow the claims of the patent, conceding their validity. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:35 am by Tiffany Blofield
This year Beyoncé, Radiohead, Lorde and several DJs (including DJ Snyder, DJ Kahleel, DJ Shadow) performed. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
As predicted by various commentators  giving a preview of the case (including in my previous post), the five Supreme Court judges (Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs) clarified the applicable law, but unanimously dismissed the appeals against the Court of Appeal decision ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334) on the facts. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am by Laura Sandwell
This appeal from the Supreme Court of Mauritius concerns a variation of the respondent’s employment conditions and whether this constitutes constructive dismissal. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
Sandoz, Inc., emphasizing that “[l]ast year’s patent decisions revealed a strong preference by the Supreme Court to tell the Federal Circuit that it should stop thinking of itself as Lord of the Patents, and that ‘supreme’ means just what it sounds like. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Daro Flooring Constructions Inc., 2021 ONSC 7558 [84] Parties should expect case conference to be used to resolve summarily procedural issues with greater frequency. [read post]