Search for: "Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2014, 8:09 am by stacy
Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., the City of New York required landlords to allow cable television companies to install wiring on the sides of residential buildings. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:23 am by admin
Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., - U.S. --, 102 S.Ct. 3164, 73 L.Ed.2d 868 (1982). [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., where the ordinance did not erode Watson's right to exclude others from property, which was central to establishing a Loretto claim. [read post]
Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982) stands for the proposition that a regulation allowing a physical invasion of private property -- no matter how de minimus the invasion might be -- is a per se regulatory taking. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:03 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419, 427 (1982) ("When faced with a constitutional challenge to a permanent physical occupation of real property, this Court has invariably found a taking. [read post]
Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982)).However, the court held that "future" accretion might never happen, so the State could acquire it without first paying compensation. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 2:57 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. (1982) 458 U.S. 419, which was relied on by the plaintiffs, but that a one-time wealth transfer may constitute a regulatory taking. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 12:01 am
Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419, 433 (1982), quoting Kaiser Aetna v. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 11:56 pm
Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982) (local ordinance required property owners to allow installation of cable TV boxes on their buildings); Nollan v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:27 am
Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982) (regulation required placement of cable TV box on rooftop), and Nollan v. [read post]