Search for: "Lorillard"
Results 81 - 100
of 206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2010, 9:08 am
The jury found that Lorillard acted with negligence, breach of trust, and in a manner that was wanton and reckless. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:08 am
“The notion that the government can require those who manufacture a lawful product to emblazon half of its package with pictures and words admittedly drafted to persuade the public not to purchase that product cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny,” Lorillard attorney Floyd Abrams said. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 6:05 am
[ABC News]* Back in the day, Lorillard Tobacco allegedly handed out cigarettes like candy to black kids. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 10:41 am
The filters, made by Lorillard Tobacco Co., released various amounts of asbestos when used, though the company has alleged that the small amounts of asbestos released posed no danger to consumers. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 8:48 am
Brown & Williamson, Lorillard, Phillip Morris, and RJ Reynolds settled with the attorney generals for expenditures by the states for the treatment of illnesses caused by smoking in the various state funded medical programs. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:57 am
Reynolds, Lorillard, and Liggett -- has filed a federal court complaint against the FDA, principally on First Amendment grounds (but also on administrative law grounds). [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 6:26 am
Yet another round of hearings is taking place this week, and Lorillard Inc., which is the largest U.S. manufacturer of menthols, is going on the offensive. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 11:15 am
(Case No. 1:11-cv-01482), Reynolds, Lorillard Inc., Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co., Liggett Group LLC and Commonwealth Brands, Inc., claim their First Amendment rights would be violated by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009 [H.R. 1256], which would require them to display graphic images of the health dangers of smoking in advertising and on their packaging.First Amendment attorney Floyd Abrams, who represents the plaintiffs, told LegalTimes the FDA regs constitute… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:42 am
The family in Boston over the Lorillard Tobacco Company? [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:21 am
Reynolds and Lorillard urged the D.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
‚¬); In re Lorillard Licensing Co., 99 USPQ2d 1312, 1316 (TTAB 2011). [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 4:03 pm
., recently announced plans for its own e-cigarette, and Lorillard, the Number 3 U.S. tobacco company, plans to spend $40 million this year to promote its own e-cigarette brand, “Blu. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 6:09 am
Hartford & Lorillard ERISA lawsuit The Plaintiff, Ms. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 5:05 am
Reynolds and Lorillard, in which a disclosure only settlement was recently announced. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:49 pm
The lawyer for North Carolina-based cigarette manufacturer Lorillard, Inc. argued that the manufacturer should not be held accountable because Evans continued to smoke after learning of the health risks, receiving warnings from doctors, and suffering a heart attack 15 years ago. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
” The Times says the news Tuesday that Reynolds American will buy Lorillard if US regulators approve, “highlighted how important e-cigarettes have become to the declining tobacco industry. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
Reynolds Tobacco Co. and Lorillard Tobacco Co., allege their First Amendment speech rights are being abridged by the FDA regs, which are drawn from the 2009Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act [H.R. 1256].The Sixth Circuit ruling doesn't specifically address the grisly depictions in the warnings of blackened lungs and cadavers, but rather, upheld the validity of the law requiring the warnings appear on the top 50 percent of the front and back of cigarette packs. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
Reynolds Tobacco Co. and Lorillard Tobacco Co., allege their First Amendment speech rights are being abridged by the FDA regs, which are drawn from the 2009Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act [H.R. 1256].The Sixth Circuit ruling doesn't specifically address the grisly depictions in the warnings of blackened lungs and cadavers, but rather, upheld the validity of the law requiring the warnings appear on the top 50 percent of the front and back of cigarette packs. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 1:25 pm
“The notion that the government can require those who manufacture a lawful product to emblazon half of its package with pictures and words admittedly drafted to persuade the public not to purchase that product cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny,” Lorillard attorney Floyd Abrams told WSJ at the time. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 1:00 pm
., 505 U.S. 504 (1992) (and distinguishing Lorillard Tobacco Company v. [read post]
