Search for: "Los Angeles Unified School District v. S"
Results 81 - 100
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The EIR related to general planning and conservation steps resulting from Los Angeles County’s prior approval of a 12,000 acre specific plan and neighboring 1500 acre conservation area in Ventura County. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 1:45 pm
Los Angeles Unified Sch. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 10:05 am
Century Law Group, the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) condemned a commercial property for a new school site. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm
Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 889, 909.) [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
” Indeed, prior to Little Rock, Eisenhower had been reluctant to lend federal muscle to desegregation efforts in the South in the years following the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Morgan Hill Unified School District (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 464). [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Morgan Hill Unified School District (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 464). [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
Michael Nash, a presiding Judge of Juvenile Court in Los Angeles, California and President of the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, has observed that as more police officers are brought into schools, the more you have to differentiate the security issue and the discipline issue. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
Michael Nash, a presiding Judge of Juvenile Court in Los Angeles, California and President of the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, has observed that as more police officers are brought into schools, the more you have to differentiate the security issue and the discipline issue. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Los Angeles Unified School District (2009) 176 CalApp.4th 889, both which held that CEQA is intended to identify effects of the proposed project, not the effects of the existing environment on that project. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
City of Oakland); and the Supreme Court’s recognition of common sense as a tool in CEQA administration (Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 6:24 am
The prospects looked bright—until, ironically, an appellate court in Los Angeles accepted Sei Fujii’s claim that the UN Charter trumped California law. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Chico Unified School District (1979) 24 Cal. 3d 703, which interprets Education Code section 44031 regarding an educator’s right to review and comment on information of a “derogatory nature” before being placed in a personnel file, was misplaced. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
San Diego Unified School Dist. (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 1013 [school district board resolution exempting projects from city’s zoning and land use laws was not project approval as it did not commit district to definite course of action regarding any project]; Chung v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm
Los Angeles Unified School Dist., it might not be hard for people to identify L.V. based on her representative's (likely her parent's) name.[29] Likewise, if a Complaint filed by John Doe in a libel case quotes the alleged libel, a quick Google search for the libel could identify its target. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
If Arnold sues Veronica for libel, claiming Veronica's accusations were lies, most courts would require it to be Arnold v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
B211398 (Los Angeles County Super. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The CRA/CLC analogized the Legislature's actions to street crime, stating that the State believed "that Proposition 22 is like a hypothetical robbery statute that prohibits the theft of someone's money unless the victim is killed first. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The CRA/CLC analogized the Legislature's actions to street crime, stating that the State believed "that Proposition 22 is like a hypothetical robbery statute that prohibits the theft of someone's money unless the victim is killed first. [read post]
