Search for: "Louisiana v. Wood" Results 101 - 120 of 153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2011, 7:16 am
What the trial court failed to realize, and the appellate court considered in its decision, is that the case of Woods v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (EEOC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
  Indeed, in Louisiana, and probably elsewhere, emotional distress claims are subsumed by product liability statutes. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
The settlement resolves Plains’ Clean Water Act violations for 10 crude oil spills in Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Kansas, and requires the company to pay a $3.25 million civil penalty. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 6:36 am
The Court of Appeal confirmed that under Louisiana law, "a plaintiff in a workers' compensation action has the burden of establishing a work-related accident" Graham v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]