Search for: "Lovejoy v. Lovejoy" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
Rejecting NOCO's argument that by offering Lovejoy-Wilson a promotion at an armored car store was, as a matter of law, a reasonable accommodation, the Second Circuit cited its ruling in Wernick v Federal Reserve Bank, 91 F.3d 379. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:08 am
To answer that question, we can turn to a recent decision, Faile v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 6:37 pm by Juvan Bonni
Sobkowski: A Matter of ‘Principal’: A Critique of the Federal Circuit’s Decision in Arthrex V. [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
Supreme Court's 5-4 decision this week in the Apple v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
Some changes may be coming to the App Store after the district court decision in the Apple v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:05 am by Diane Marie Amann
The day’s schedule begins with a public plenary session from 9:15-11:15 a.m. in the law school’s Hatton Lovejoy Courtroom, as follows: ► 9:15 a.m. [read post]