Search for: "Low v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC."
Results 21 - 40
of 309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2009, 10:24 am
The 9th Circuit issued its long awaited opinion in Gordon v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
The Court of Appeal reverses the trial court and holds that Santa Monica isn't required to move from at-large voting for council members to district-level voting. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:38 am
Supreme Court, In U.S. v. [read post]
Allegations That Designer Wedding Dress Line Constitutes A Relevant Product Market Found Implausible
30 Dec 2014, 10:36 am
House of Brides etc., v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 8:57 am
Tsakopoulos Investments, LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
(Posner, Obama, Sunstein, Meltzer & Epstein, etc. were all still around). [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
In Ross v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 10:14 pm
It's clear that Apple's priority is to have the full appeals court look at the causal nexus issue, and the Galaxy Nexus as a product is a very low priority (or next to no priority) by now. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
Nevertheless, when the constitutionality of Section 5 was first brought before the Court in South Carolina v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm
Right after Thanksgiving, the Court of Appeal in the Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, filed an opinion in Kim v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
On July, 24, 2013, the Ninth Circuit rejected Fox's appeal, and affirmed the district court's refusal to enjoin Dish Network's features. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
In December 2019, the Supreme Court granted review in County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
Curran, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:02 am
Curran, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 12:52 pm
Under Franks v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 2:05 pm
The district court slashed their fees, and they appealed.The Second Circuit held that fees should be "what a reasonable, paying client would be willing to pay. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:25 am
Their school districts are not providing tutoring. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am
Inasmuch as Defendants did not reside or work for gain in India, it was only the District Court Arizona that was the appropriate forum/forum conveniens to decide the dispute.36. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 1:12 pm
As LJ Lewison has explained in Birmingham CC v Stephenson (2016) HLR 44 (our note), a possession claim hearing may be adjourned for a wide range of reasons, not limited to those in CPR 55.8 (lack of court time, sudden illness of a party, breakdown of video/audio arrangements, etc, etc) and on any such adjournment case management directions may or may not be given. [read post]
