Search for: "Lowe v. Bailey" Results 1 - 20 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2022, 7:52 am by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
This means if it’s more than one outcome, or the user cannot be identified, then the granularity is too high; (ii) be granular enough that they are distinguished from business lines which are a collection of services; (iii) be at a level where one impact tolerance per regulatory objective can be set; (iv) not be at the level of internal services (where the granularity would be too low); and (v) be at a level where boards can make prioritisation and investment decisions. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 2:05 pm by Jeff Welty
Lee Bailey & Kenneth Fishman, Handling Narcotic & Drug Cases § 131.2 (Feb. 2019 update) (citing State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:43 pm by Shaheen Rahman
Updated | Bailey & Others v London Borough of Brent Council [2011] EWHC 2572 (Admin) – Read judgment Every Wednesday my daughter looks forward to the arrival of the mobile library at her nursery. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Senate’s Roy Moore perplex [Matt Kwong, CBC] And my Twitter thread on the signed yearbook that figures in Monday’s allegations went viral; Time to end it: “Low-Income Housing Tax Credit: Costly, Complex, and Corruption-Prone” [Chris Edwards and Vanessa Brown Calder, Cato] “When Statutes Conflict, Agencies Shouldn’t Get to Pick Which One They Like More” [Ilya Shapiro, Cato on Cato certiorari amicus in Chevron deference case of Perez-Guzman… [read post]
19 May 2008, 1:00 am
The 6th Circuit has now also weighed in on this issue of second-hand harassment (sort of), in Bailey v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:42 am by Bexis
  Here’s a copy of the Bailey summary judgment opinion, annotated with its clearance for publication:  Bailey v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The phone hacking trial continued at the Old Bailey this week, with evidence being heard on Monday 13 January, Tuesday 14 January and Wednesday 15 January. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 5:00 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Friday morning read: Abortion Providers Ask Supreme Court for Fast Review of Texas Ban (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) The Supreme Court has only itself to blame (Jennifer Rubin, The Washington Post) Public approval of Supreme Court hits a new low in US, Gallup poll finds (Bailey Aldridge, McClatchy) One Legal Strategy to Preserve Roe v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm by John Floyd
The new provisions give voice to the admonition in Imble v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:17 am
  Similar sentiments have been expressed by David Fewer, Jane Bailey and Karen Lowe. [read post]