Search for: "Lowe v. Callahan" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
"Judge Callahan holds, however, that there's precisely such “clearly irreconcilable” intervening authority: Sorrell v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 12:12 pm
"Police officer Ryan Moody was cruising a high-crime (read: low-income) area in Lakewood, Washington known for drug dealing and prostitution, including underage prostitution, at 3:30 a.m. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
  Judges McKeown and Murguia -- two left-leaning women on the panel -- join a concurrence that says that the majority goes to far, and that in their view, prior low salary is okay to consider if it's combined with other factors that justify the contemporary salary differential.Judges Callahan and Tallman, not surprisingly, are even less sympathetic to the majority opinion, and agree that the current case was improperly resolved (since the only basis for the pay… [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 10:46 am
The San Francisco ordinance here -- upheld by the panel -- is meant to ensure health care for individuals in low-wage jobs. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 1:58 pm by Jon Sands
Buy low and sell high can make one money in stocks. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:33 am by Jon Sands
Previous 9th cases had gone as low as 1/8th. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:39 am
Fellow State Bar Convention panelist Brian Reider recently alerted our panel */ to the Fourth Appellate District's August 26, 2009, decision Parada v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:39 pm
Magistrate Judge Callahan issued the warrant on January 22.U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 7:06 am by Joanna Schwartz
.'" The challenge of identifying clearly established law is heightened further by the Court's decision in Pearson v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 12:13 pm by Wendy McGuire Coats
From: Judges Gould, Bybee, Callahan & Bea On September 20, 2010, Circuit Judge Gould joined by Circuit Judges Bybee, Callahan, and Bea issued an order dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]