Search for: "Lowe v. Clayton"
Results 81 - 100
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Indiana University is financially self-interested twice over: it benefits from having more demand for its student housing, and it also benefits from having low-cost land nearby that it can acquire on favorable terms. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 12:18 pm
Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:50 pm
The difference in presenting data to a jury v. to a judge is a big one. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 1:06 pm
Man takes Shreveport, La. officers on low-speed chase. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 8:31 am
Zarda, and Bostock v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 11:44 am
The Supreme Court’s unanimous April 2021 decision in AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Jack M. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
Emerging Issues in the Biological Sciences Panel four was moderated by Professor Ellen Wright Clayton, the Craig-Weaver Professor of Pediatrics, and Professor of Law and of Health Policy at Vanderbilt Law School, at Vanderbilt University. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
”Although Senator Sasse deserves a few points for not descending into the muck with his Republican colleagues, that’s a very low bar. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:27 am
Based upon the identification of high-density “environmental zones” or “low-emission zones,” benefits are granted to freight vehicles that are environmentally friendly. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:30 pm
Often these sub-limits are as low as $250,000 or less. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
District court: No Clayton Act violation. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The FTC alleges that the execution of the parties’ merger agreement was, and the proposed acquisition would be, an “unfair method of competition” in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act and that the effect of the proposed acquisition “may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly” in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
The phone call was played for the jury, but the audio was of low quality. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
"[18] Significantly, anti-trust laws do not necessarily guarantee low prices, only the conditions that lead to them.[19] This distinction is intentional; the United States Supreme Court has recognized that while it may set the circumstances for achieving a fair price, the workings of a liberal market are better able to determine the fair price itself.[20] While anti-trust laws prohibit fixing maximum prices, the entire goal of the FPGPA is to accomplish just that. [read post]
