Search for: "Lowe v. Com."
Results 41 - 60
of 201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2022, 11:16 am
It said, amongst other things, that there was an extremely low volume of website traffic from the U.K. and EU (as compared with the U.S. traffic), and, whilst it did advertise shipping in the U.K., arrange for payment of import fees and offer the ability to shop in British pounds, it actively encouraged users to shop on their local Amazon website instead (e.g. www.amazon.co.uk if a user is based in the U.K.). [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:23 pm
Clark v Affinity Sutton Homes Ltd. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:23 pm
Clark v Affinity Sutton Homes Ltd. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 4:26 am
If the success rate on PCR petitions is low, it’s non-existent anymore on sentencing issues, as State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:53 am
Public Utilities Com., S208838. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 3:21 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:00 pm
’s (collectively “Ultramercial”) patent infringement com- plaint under Fed. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:41 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:05 am
You’ll recall that former Bell City Manager Robert Rizzo was drawing down almost $800,000 per year to run the tiny low-income Southern California city. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 4:12 am
Bruguier, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 6:20 pm
Com. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
State Lands Com. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 3:38 am
State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm
Evans constructed a model showing that the Bidding Agreements reduced 1-800 Contacts’ cost-per-click by 49-59 percent. 1-800 Contacts itself estimated in 2008 that competitive auction bidding cost it an additional $20,434 per month in advertising costs. 1-800 Contacts’ contemporaneous documents directly link a reduction in competition to lower advertising costs: “low competition equals low cost. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC, 837 F.3d 918, 932 (8th Cir. 2016) (finding viable FDCPA claims based on amounts "misstated by $1.29, $1.84, and $0.65" because "there [i]s no de minimis exception to FDCPA liability based upon low dollar amounts").[4]FULL TEXT OF DISSENTING OPINION STEPHEN A. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:43 am
One is State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
