Search for: "Lowe v. Price"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,288
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2023, 5:03 am
" Thereafter, the price goes up to $32. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:12 pm
In Brown Shoe v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Sometimes external environment-level innovation is more efficient: ramps v. stair climing wheelchairs. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
After explaining the general principles of FRAND the Judge in Interdigital v Lenovo FRAND judgment [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat) calculated what the FRAND rates should be for Lenovo. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 2:13 am
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri regarding the recent judgment of the High Court of England and Wales in the Lifestyle Equities v Berkshire Polo trade mark dispute. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 5:08 am
Brands may lack the product knowledge to do so, while low prices can no longer serve as a counterfeit indicator, as second-hand goods are usually cheaper; thus, it is easy to miss them. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:14 am
“While it might seem self-evident that controlling shareholders of a corporation may not enrich themselves personally by altering the terms and conditions of minority shareholders employment to force a buy-out at a low price,” the Court observed, “that is not always the case. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 12:39 pm
Instead, again, they cite to Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:09 am
ML Genius v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 7:37 am
” People v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
I have never seen statistics that low. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Under this theory, the Supreme Court held in American Electric Power v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:55 am
– this is a low bar that is often met; (2) are damages an adequate remedy for the patentee (if so, no PI is likely to be granted), are they adequate for the defendant? [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 12:52 am
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri (Warner Bros Discovery) regarding the most recent instalment in the Lidl v Tesco IP dispute. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:17 am
" WiFi patent royalties are relatively low (compared to cellular standards). [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm
Uriel-Charles discussed the 1960 Supreme Court case Gomillion v. [read post]
10th Circuit endorses presumption of Lanham Act false advertising injury in mostly two-player market
29 Jun 2023, 5:15 am
Vitamins Online, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:49 pm
We just completed a two-part series on the Truthful Cost or Pricing Data Statute, commonly known as the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA).[1] We will return to TINA in a few months to address the Defense Contract Audit Agency’s (DCAA) playbook for defective pricing audits. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 7:29 am
This post is the second of four, considering the decision of Smith J in Lidl v Tesco [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch), focusing on the passing off element of the judgment. [read post]
