Search for: "Lowe v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc" Results 61 - 80 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am by Lorene Park
The ADA does not require an employer to place an employee on permanent light duty or give other workers an employee’s assignments to accommodate a physical impairment (Josey v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
If, however, the injured person paid less than the exchange rate, he can recover no more than the amount paid, except when the low rate was intended as a gift to him.Id. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 10:09 am by Gary Watt
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 382, which held that the last valid offer shifts costs. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:24 am by Lyle Denniston
In agreeing to hear Tyson’s case, the Court took no action on a pair of petitions raising similar issues, by the huge retail chain, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 30 S.W.3d 455, 463 (Tex. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 6:50 am by Greg Mersol
  Similarly, courts conditionally certifying classes often indicate that they cannot weigh the merits, but as reflected in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[ii] Because of this low standard, shareholders generally are permitted to proceed with their sought after review of corporate records. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bone/Wal-Mart on error costs: source identification is expensive to determine, which I think the paper is clear about in struggling w/solutions. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 12:20 pm by S2KM Limited
Supreme Court's 2011 ruling in favor of Wal-Mart in the sexual discrimination and civil rights class action case Wal-Mart Stores Inc. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 10:46 am by Ronald F. Wick
The court further took issue with many of the plaintiffs’ suggested common issues of fact, drawing on the recent Supreme Court decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:00 am by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. on April 26, 2010, and the subsequent grant of certiorari in the case by the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:09 am by Patrick T. Ryan
It then rejected the argument that nothing in Rule 23 prohibits a negotiation class as failing to recognize the Supreme Court’s guidance in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]