Search for: "Lowers v. Lowers (Complete Opinion)" Results 1 - 20 of 2,694
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm by Andrew Kent
The Supreme Court has not expressly approved these practices of the lower courts, however. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 11:14 am
(here) and a clarification of a lower court misunderstanding arising from the 2005 case Pace v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 11:57 am
In a case that is being closely watched in the multi-family housing industry, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals this week released its opinion affirming the lower court's holding that the 2-year statute of limitations for a private civil action alleging violation of the Fair Housing Act's accessibility requirements for design and construction is triggered, i.e., the violation is complete, at the conclusion of the design and construction phase, which occurs on… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 5:41 am by Benjamin Wittes
Having now read Judge William Pauley’s opinion in ACLU v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:28 am by Ronald Mann
After the swirl of controversy in the lower courts, the Court’s disposition of RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
In the opinion it was stated that “policies favoring arbitration support a stay of all court proceedings pending arbitration ‘where the arbitrable and nonarbitrable issues, although severable, are also interrelated in terms of a complete resolution of the cause between the parties,’” Casablanca Trax, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:19 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals accepted the lower court’s near complete embrace of the findings by AT&T’s expert witnesses who purported to show that the vertical combination of AT&T and Time Warner would have no impact on content prices and create no increased ability for key content outlets, such as CNN and HBO, to demand higher compensation and weather longer blackout period of no compensation to extract better terms. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:19 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals accepted the lower court’s near complete embrace of the findings by AT&T’s expert witnesses who purported to show that the vertical combination of AT&T and Time Warner would have no impact on content prices and create no increased ability for key content outlets, such as CNN and HBO, to demand higher compensation and weather longer blackout period of no compensation to extract better terms. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 1:11 pm by Derek Black
  As I noted earlier today at Education Law Prof Blog, the Court neither upheld nor struck down the Texas higher education admissions policy in Fisher v. [read post]