Search for: "Lucas v. District Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2010, 3:15 am
Supreme Court Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd, R (on the application of)v Wolverhampton City Council & Anor [2010] UKSC 20 (12 May 2010) ZN (Afghanistan) & Ors v Entry Clearance Officer (Karachi) [2010] UKSC 21 (12 May 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust v Roldan [2010] EWCA Civ 522 (13 May 2010) Moulton v Chief Constable of the West Midlands [2010] EWCA Civ 524 (13 May 2010) De Bruyne v… [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:42 am
In Bullcoming v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:22 pm
Guest post by Paul Cole, European Patent Attorney, Lucas & Co. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:38 am
Lucas v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:41 pm
Lucas, et al (5D09-4213), the Fifth District, sitting en banc, clarified that an order denying a motion to intervene is reviewable as a final order. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
They had a soon together, Luca Andrea, who was born in 1970.The IPKat has already reported on a case brought jointly by Luca Andrea Dotti and Audrey Hepburn's other son, Sean Hepburn Ferrer, and decided by the Court of First Instance of Milan in 2015 concerning unauthorized evocation (not even direct use) of the likeness of Audrey Hepburn in an advertisement. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:30 am
Seattle School District No. 1, the Court sharply limited the circumstances under which public schools could consider race to ensure that schools were integrated. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:54 am
Lucas (1983) and Schweiker v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
”[FN4]In Lucas v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:03 am
Facts: This case (Ribeiro et al v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:03 am
Facts: This case (Ribeiro et al v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 6:05 am
Lucas v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:22 pm
The trial court found that there was a complete taking because the City denied the owner all economically viable use of the property, as in the landmark Lucas v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:46 pm
Facts: The plaintiff was injured during a port call to Cabo San Lucas. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:06 am
All best, Lucas Vazquez Hedges v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
District Court for the Western District of South Carolina, which found that the three Star Wars prequels were "unreasonably dangerous and defective" as a matter of law. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:35 am
On February 6, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Capital Care Network of Toledo v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 2:46 am
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of Lucas’ argument by noting that in Florida v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
District Court for the Western District of South Carolina, which found that the three Star Wars prequels were “unreasonably dangerous and defective” as a matter of law. [read post]
