Search for: "Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council" Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2016, 8:15 am by Ilya Somin
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992), Scalia’s majority opinion ruled that a regulation that completely wipes out all economically valuable uses of an owner’s land qualifies as a taking. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm by Jack Pringle
IntroductionThe South Carolina Supreme Court recently issued Dunes West Golf Club v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm by Jack Pringle
IntroductionThe South Carolina Supreme Court recently issued Dunes West Golf Club v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:58 am by Lawrence Solum
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992), these lectures are not lectures in American constitutional law, nor do they aim to build pathways through the swamp of US takings jurisprudence Highly recommended. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
In 1992, Justice Scalia penned the opinion in Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council in which the Court ruled that regulations which deprive a landowner of “all economically productive or beneficial uses of land” require compensation absent the presence of a “common-law prohibition. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
In 1992, Justice Scalia penned the opinion in Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council in which the Court ruled that regulations which deprive a landowner of “all economically productive or beneficial uses of land” require compensation absent the presence of a “common-law prohibition. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:53 am
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992) 505 U.S. 1003); the County’s actions amounted to a regulatory taking under the factor-based Penn Central test (Penn Central Transp. [read post]