Search for: "Lucas v. Zoning Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
CFC: Trial Needed On Whether Wrongful Assertion Of Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Is "Extraordinary Delay"
10 Feb 2009, 2:24 pm
Head's up on an interesting case from the Court of Federal Claims, Resource Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
inversecondemnation.com - http://www.inversecondemnation.com/inversecondemnation/
Second District Affirms Judgment Upholding City of Pomona’s Commercial Cannabis Permit Program Overlay District As CEQA-Exempt Under Statutory Exemption Provided In Guidelines Section 15183 For Projects Consistent With Development Density Established By Existing Zoning, General Plan, Or Community Plan for Which EIR Was Certified; Holds Substantial Evidence Standard of Review Applies To Lead Agency’s Finding of Exemption
27 Jun 2023, 3:15 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Gregory Lucas v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Court of Appeal Rules that Denial of a Landowner's Application to Develop Property Can Be a Compensable Regulatory Taking
5 Jan 2012, 5:22 pm
Co. v. [read post]
Real Estate and Construction Law Blog - http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/
Land Use Law Appellate Court Opinion - 8/1/11
1 Aug 2011, 1:08 pm
Category: Recent Decisions;Land Use Opinions Body: Below is today's land use law Appellate Court opinion: AC32110 - Lucas v. [read post]
CT Judicial Law Libraries' NewsLog - http://ersa.jud.ct.gov/lawlibnews/Lists/Posts/AllPosts.aspx
Some Uses Just Don't Belong: Land Use Law and "Caddyshack"
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm by Jack Pringle
"  Al Czervik.The Town, no stranger to zoning controversies (see for example Ion v. [read post]
South Carolina Business Law Blog - http://www.scbusinesslawblog.com/
Some Uses Just Don't Belong: Land Use Law and "Caddyshack"
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm by Jack Pringle
  Al Czervik.The Town, no stranger to zoning controversies (see for example Ion v. [read post]
South Carolina Business Law Blog - http://www.scbusinesslawblog.com/
OH Supreme Court Holds that Amendment to Minimum Size Requirement for
28 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm by Patricia Salkin
The plaintiffs then filed an appeal in the Lucas County Common Pleas Court, which upheld the zoning commission’s decision. [read post]
Law of the Land - http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/
Court Answers Monk's Prayers: City, Thou Shall Not Take!
4 Nov 2008, 7:02 pm
Procedural History The owners filed an inverse condemnation action, claiming that, under Lucas v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Whistling Past Ms. Knick’s Graveyard: The Unstated But Possible Consequences of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Takings Decision In Knick v. Township Of Scott, Pennsylvania
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
” Citing Railroad Commission of Texas v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Whistling Past Ms. Knick’s Graveyard: The Unstated But Possible Consequences of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Takings Decision In Knick v. Township Of Scott, Pennsylvania
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
” Citing Railroad Commission of Texas v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Live Blog Today: Must A Property Owner Seek To Change The Law To Ripen A Federal Takings Claim?
8 Dec 2010, 9:37 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Lucas v. [read post]
inversecondemnation.com - http://www.inversecondemnation.com/inversecondemnation/
You Take It, You Bought It
7 Jun 2010, 4:38 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
" Armstrong v. [read post]
inversecondemnation.com - http://www.inversecondemnation.com/inversecondemnation/
Supreme Court decides Takings Clause case as term winds down
23 Jun 2017, 6:28 am by Scott Bomboy
The Murr family’s lawyers cited another landmark Supreme Court decision, Lucas v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/
Regulatory Takings Revisited
27 Mar 2014, 8:09 am by stacy
  In Loretto v. [read post]
An Eminent Domain Blog - http://www.condemnation-law.com/blog
Regulatory Takings Revisited
27 Mar 2014, 8:09 am by stacy
  In Loretto v. [read post]
An Eminent Domain Blog - http://www.condemnation-law.com/blog
Regulatory Takings Revisited
27 Mar 2014, 8:09 am by stacy
  In Loretto v. [read post]
An Eminent Domain Blog - http://www.condemnation-law.com/blog
Regulatory Takings Revisited
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 am by Biersdorf & Associates
  In Loretto v. [read post]
An Eminent Domain Blog - http://www.condemnation-law.com/blog
Regulatory Takings Revisited
27 Mar 2014, 8:09 am by Cale
  In Loretto v. [read post]
An Eminent Domain Blog - http://www.condemnation-law.com/blog
CEQA Remedies Go Both Ways:  Fourth District Reverses Judgment Upholding San Diego County Board’s Decision Granting Project Opponents’ Administrative Appeal, Holds Board Erred In Finding CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Statutory Exemption Inapplicable And Ordering EIR Prepared for Exempt Industrial Project
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Dublin (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 1301, 1311 (my 4/10/13 post on which can be found here); Lucas v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
How Will Justice Scalia’s Passing Impact Land Use?
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  For those of us actively representing landowners in California’s coastal zone at the time, our immediate reaction was that an overly zealous Coastal Commission had been chastised. [read post]
Lay of the Land - http://landuse.coxcastle.com/