Search for: "Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission" Results 21 - 40 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court  held that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) are “officers of the United States” whose appointments are therefore subject to the Appointments Clause of the Constitution for their actions to be valid. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 9:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Securities and Exchange Commission, Pereira v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 6:21 am
SEC, a significant decision that holds that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC” or “Commission”) use of administrative law judges (“ALJs”) is constitutional. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 8:40 pm
SEC to consider whether administrative law judges (ALJs) in the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are 'Officers of the United States.'" [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:06 am by Doug Cornelius
There have been several challenges to the constitutionality of the in-house judges at the Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 5:28 am by Andrew Hamm
Securities and Exchange Commission, South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 1:28 pm
In re: Pending Administrative Proceedings (Order, Securities and Exchange Commission; '33 Act Rel. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 11:14 am by Walter Olson
Caleb Brown interviews Trevor Burrus and me for the Cato Daily Podcast on Lucia v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) administrative law judges (ALJs) are employees who are not subject to the Appointments Clause of the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:31 am by Alan Brackett
In response to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Lucia v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:02 am by David Keenan
The issue came to the Commission through a securities fraud case involving former investment advisor Ray Lucia, Sr., host of the Ray Lucia financial talk radio show, and Raymond J. [read post]