Search for: "Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission"
Results 101 - 120
of 171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, about whether the commission’s administrative-law judges are “officers of the United States,” subject to the appointments clause in Article 2 of the Constitution. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:08 am
Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:26 pm
Earlier this month on a Friday afternoon, the Securities and Exchange Commission quietly issued an extraordinary administrative order. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:20 am
Lucia Cos. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 7:55 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, a petition asking the Supreme Court to consider whether administrative law judges who preside over hearings within the SEC are officers under the appointments clause of the Constitution. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Consider Lucia v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:02 am
Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:30 pm
The case is Lucia v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
SEC, centers on a dispute over administrative law judges (ALJs) who work for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 9:02 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission has enabled changes to hiring and firing of ALJs that undermine their independence and impartiality. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, which asks whether SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the Constitution’s appointments clause. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, 17-130, and Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
Second, the Court held that the Commission did not exceed its rulemaking authority by adopting Exchange Act Rule 14e-3(a) to bar trading on undisclosed information in tender offers, even in the absence of a duty to disclose.It is the first question in O’Hagan that has likely drawn the most commentary. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 4:32 am
” Briefly: For The Wall Street Journal, Gabriel Rubin reports that “[t]he Securities and Exchange Commission said it plans to rehear dozens of cases that were pending before its in-house administrative-law judges, following a June Supreme Court ruling[, in Lucia v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am
Andrew Chung reports at Reuters that the justices “agreed to hear a challenge to a key Securities and Exchange Commission practice – its use of in-house judges to enforce investor protection laws” Additional coverage of the grant in Lucia v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am
Securities and Exchange Commission that SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:02 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) proceeding against Jarkesy and his company for possible securities fraud violated the Constitution in three separate ways. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:06 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, which concluded that the appointment of administrative law judges within the Securities and Exchange Commission did not comply with Article II of the Constitution. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:03 pm
In 2018, the Court held in Lucia v. [read post]
