Search for: "Lucy v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2016, 12:14 pm
State of Florida, July 15, 2016, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal More Blog Entries: Grimes v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
Lucy J. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
Lucy J. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 9:18 am
Lucie and Fort Lauderdale. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 9:18 am
Lucie and Fort Lauderdale. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:45 am
Lucy has the exciting details.In other news, the Law Society Gazette reports the comments of the Master of the Rolls Lord Neuberger in the Ambrosiadou v Coward case last week, that court hearings should not be private. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:27 am
Judgments were also published in non-anyonmised form – see Doncaster v Haigh and Doncaster v Watson. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 10:42 am
Lucie and Fort Lauderdale. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 7:56 am
The Ninth Circuit overturned a $102 million dollar judgment issued by United States District Judge Lucy H. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm
Even readers of the red-top press and children's comics will probably be well apprised of this case by now, although they might be forgiven for getting this case confused with the seeming millions of other Apple v Samsung, Apple v The World, The World v Apple-type disputes that have been plaguing courts across the globe. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:48 am
Lucie. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 10:07 am
Lucie and Fort Lauderdale. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:08 am
Lucie and Fort Lauderdale. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:08 am
Lucie and Fort Lauderdale. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:44 am
Now, Illinois joins the growing number of states to abolish the public duty doctrine, after a divided decision in Coleman v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:08 am
Lucie and Fort Lauderdale. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 6:35 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:20 am
Additional coverage comes from Xi Lucy Shi at Jurist. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:29 pm
The Business Court decision last week in Shamoon v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
