Search for: "Lumos" Results 21 - 23 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2013, 1:47 am
It was not open to the Court of Appeal, in the circumstances, to disturb those findings or to make findings in relation to an alternative case which had not been argued before the trial Judge or put to witnesses during the course of cross examination [whether the Court of Appeal can ignore, vary or generally improvise upon the findings of the trial judge is a bit of a hot topic at the moment: see earlier Katposts on Lumos here and Fine & Country here. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/8madKvpiNf -> Pubs ordered to pay £19500 for Premier League copyright breaches http://t.co/ytXNOhmezi -> Link to Google v Garcia 9th Circuit en banc decision https://t.co/ecycj9miDd -> WIPO Magazine takes a look at copyright http://t.co/yOHBVHg1lD -> Friday’s Endnotes – 05/15/15 http://t.co/rQbmoWMhya -> Irish Data Protection Commissioner to Investigate Apps and Websites Targeting Children http://t.co/Xr26WwRTSK -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law… [read post]