Search for: "Lumsden v. State"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2021, 12:19 am
In reaching this conclusion, the Senior Master referred to: Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 at [132]; McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73 per Buxton LJ at [8]; Wainwright v The Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406 at [18]-[19] and [23], [43] and [62] Perhaps unsurprisingly, the notion of a tort of physical intrusion privacy were given short shrift. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am
Buried on Page 85 of Lord Nimmo Smith’s report, it states : “The Advocate Depute telephoned the Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser, who was in London. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:32 pm
According to Lumsden v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 9:41 am
A recent example of how focusing on the “sufficiency of the evidence” is particularly vital in defending against allegations of Criminal Solicitation of a Minor can be found in the case of Lumsden v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
“Head-of-state-owned enterprise” immunity. [read post]
