Search for: "Luster v. Johnson"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
Third, the district court properly applied the firearms sentencing enhancement because Luster reasonably could have foreseen that Davis and Johnson possessed firearms in furtherance of their large cocaine distribution enterprise.In Miller, Keith v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:06 am
Citing U.S. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:06 am
Citing U.S. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 6:01 pm
” It could conceive of no circumstances when calling a subordinate that name would be acceptable (Johnson v STRIVE East Harlem Employment Group). [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:21 am
By Pamela Wolf, J.D. [read post]
