Search for: "Ly v. Holder"
Results 1 - 20
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2012, 7:42 am
Lying to Congress puts you in violation of the False Statements Act. [read post]
19 May 2013, 1:06 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:35 am
* Citing SolarCity Corp. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:24 am
Holder, 565 U.S. 42, 64 (2011)). ... [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 3:39 pm
Although I do not know, I believe that many copyright holders have taken similar steps. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 9:29 am
See Fox v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 4:53 am
In SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 6:05 am
The principal question in yesterday’s argument in SCA Hygiene Products v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm
Holder and Evenwel v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
In the 1964 case of New York Times v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:37 am
This retroactive policy renewal was the issue in Campo v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 8:17 am
But then came the CJEU (in Huawei v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
First, consistent with the Supremes’ decision in Malone, pleadings and remedies problems made FDD claims by holders problematic, even before the feds’ ruled these claims were preempted in Dabit. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:05 am
Supreme Court was presented with the use of "substanially" in the context of "substantially burden[ing] a person's exercise of religion" Burwell v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
" Enying Li v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 6:36 am
Marcum is not the account holder on the U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
Only one unreversed Supreme Court majority opinion has upheld a content-based speech restriction on strict scrutiny grounds — last year’s Holder v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:04 pm
The background to Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
