Search for: "Lyles v. Harris" Results 1 - 20 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2007, 7:04 am
Over at SCOTUSblog, Lyle Denniston is reporting that the Supreme Court handed down Scott v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:49 pm by Andrew Hamm
.: Lyle Denniston previewed next week’s arguments in McDonnell v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 2:11 pm by Kali Borkoski
[Updated: 2:13] Our symposium on Harris v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:30 pm by Kali Borkoski
[New: 5:28] Lyle’s report on Harris v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
[Lyle Denniston, SCOTUSBlog; Instapundit, citing “Supreme Court’s 1958 decision in NAACP v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 8:11 am
"Court rules on two patent cases, and on high-speed chase": Lyle Denniston has this post at "SCOTUSblog. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:50 am by Amy Howe
MGM, a dispute over the copyright for the movie “Raging Bull,” and Harris v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 7:59 pm by Anna Christensen
Harris Associates both received a great deal of media attention this week. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 3:12 am by Amy Howe
In the Arizona Daily Star, Howard Fischer previews the December argument in Harris v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
California Teachers Association, on First Amendment rights of individual public employees against unions, potentially major sequel to Harris v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am by Amy Howe
  Most of the coverage and commentary focuses on the argument in the first case, Harris v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 12:32 pm
Lyle Denniston of SCOTUSblog has an entry just posted titled " A flat new rule on high-speed chases. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
Over the weekend MSNBC’s Melissa Harris-Perry discussed the Alabama redistricting cases and King v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:01 am by Amy Howe
This morning the Court will hear oral arguments in Harris v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 2:13 am by Jon Gelman
"Related articlesSupreme Court: Private contractors not obligated to pay union fees (cbsnews.com)Why SCOTUS's Harris v. [read post]