Search for: "Lyles v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 1,488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 2:46 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In The Huffington Post, Cristian Farias reports that the brief filed by the United States last week in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 2:22 pm by Russell Mace
The Supreme Court of South Carolina previously ruled under State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Overton v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:08 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Bohannan, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2261 (21 September 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tate & Lyle Technology Ltd v Roquette Freres [2010] EWCA Civ 1049 (11 October 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Taylor v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 2494 (QB) (11 October 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Ramzan v Brookwide Ltd [2010] EWHC 2453 (Ch) (08 October 2010) High Court (Administrative… [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 7:29 am
  Here is Lyle's early report:[T]he Court declined to rule on the question of whether the sentencing decision in Blakely v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
United States, on which Lyle Denniston reported for this blog. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:21 am
Minnesota (06-8273): "Are state supreme courts required to use the standard announced in Teague v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:18 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston explained the state of play for this blog; other coverage comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 4:20 am by Amy Howe
As Lyle reported yesterday for this blog, the California Supreme Court has declined to revive that state’s ban on same-sex marriage – the measure at the center of last Term’s decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:14 am
Lyle Denniston reports at SCOTUS Blog that the Justices did not accept any new cert petitions this morning. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
Cheever, in which the Court will consider the scope of a defendant’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination when he introduces evidence regarding his mental state to counter the charges against him; and Kaley v. [read post]