Search for: "Lynch v. Lord"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2009, 7:39 am
Gordon v Lynch, 2009 CSOH 116, is a decision of Lord Woolman on quantum in a personal injuries case notable only, so far as this blog is concerned, for its use of a hyperlink: something I have never seen before in a Scottish Courts decision ((When reported on BAILII, of course, hyperlinks are commonly used for citations of earlier authority.)). [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 4:37 pm
Her analysis focused on the foundation of Lord Bannatyne’s reasoning, the case of Campbell v MGN Ltd. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
This will be heard by Lord Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
From Monday 7 to Wednesday 9 March 2011, Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance and Collins will hear Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
First, on Monday 4 and Tuesday 5 April 2011, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
The case of E (Children) will be heard in Courtroom 2 by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Sir Nicholas Wilson. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
On Wednesday 23 and Thursday 24 March, Bloomsbury International Limited and others v Sea Fish Industry Authority and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs will be heard by Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, Lords Mance and Collins. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
The case of Parkwood Leisure Limited v Alemo-Herron and others will be heard from Wednesday 13 to Thursday 14 April 2011, also by Lords Hope, Walker, Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
There are two appeals in the Privy Council this week to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:51 am
Relying on Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 1:32 am
Mountford [1985] House of Lords It all goes back to the case of Street v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
The three linked appeals, Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland), Scottish Widows plc No.2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) and Scottish Widows plc (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, will be heard in the Supreme Court this week by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Neuberger and Lord Clarke. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 1:29 pm
It is a Supreme Court case from 1992, Lee v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:06 am
We mean we cannot have judges legislating lord forbid. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:54 am
Instead, Lord Neuberger went back to the familiar territory of Vicom and the previous Court of Appeal judgments in Merrill Lynch, Fujitsu and Gale. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
In Courtroom 2, on Thursday 16 June 2011, the case of R v Smith will be heard by Lords Phillips, Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins and Lord Wilson. [read post]
PLLIP Summit Will Highlight Innovation and Analytics From Thought Leaders Teninbaum, Katz and Abrahm
8 May 2017, 2:00 am
V. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:37 am
Proposing the “no endorsement” test in Lynch v. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 2:26 pm
It was still being used last year to prevent anti-lynching legislation – what’s American about lynching? [read post]
