Search for: "Lynch v. United States Government"
Results 1 - 20
of 497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm
On 7-8 March 2024, there was a hearing in the data protection case of Lynch v Serious Fraud Office KB-2024-000237. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:16 pm
First, it is focused quite directly on the law in action, suggesting that the true functional law is Lynch’s rather than that of the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
This freedom to speak against the government and government officials is essential in a free society committed to the preeminence of the people. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 12:11 am
The Supreme Court adopted a test in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Lynch, 576 U.S. 143, 150 (2015) (cleaned up). [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:38 pm
She reasoned that banning males from a state nursing school was based on tired stereotypes, which set the stage for the later decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
” She even posted a walk-through video and insisted that she knows all of the governing legal rules. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Another straw appeared in the wind on April 6 of that year, when then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch[1] gave a strong and unusually strident speech before the spring meeting of the American Bar Association Antitrust Law Section, singling out anticompetitive mergers for especially pointed criticism, and dismissing some recent proposed transactions as unworthy even of contemplation by the firms involved—a theme laced with scorn for antitrust counselors, their business clients, and the… [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:20 am
Fyk can bring a claim against the United States government; preventing such a flood of lawsuits is at the core of standing doctrine. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
There is still time to register for the Supreme Court Historical Society's commemoration of Juneteenth, a conversation with Judge Curtis Collier and the Society’s Executive Director, Jim Duff, on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and the resulting US Supreme Court decisions, United States v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:50 pm
Before the United State District Court of Missouri, Eastern Division (the “Court”) was the City’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 10:41 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
In Whren v. [read post]
