Search for: "M.-R. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2019, 10:54 am by David Oscar Markus
” Finally, the Court notes that it does not adopt citations in the R&R that do not conform to The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation (Columbia Law Review Ass’n et al. eds., 20th ed. 2015).Yikes.Here’s the R&R and the District Order.Update— both in the comments and in emails/texts, people are criticizing me for posting this public order. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:11 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia: Boumediene v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:04 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
” Finally, the Court notes that it does not adopt citations in the R&R that do not conform to The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation (Columbia Law Review Ass’n et al. eds., 20th ed. 2015). [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
Goldberg et al. eds., 2011), Reference Area(KF8205.A2 I535 2011). [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 10:39 am
Pakootas, et al. (06-1188). [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am by Justin Cole
” Other briefs that make this argument: Seattle School District No. 1; Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), Congressman Mike Johnson (R-LA), et al. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
A 2019 epidemiological study has revealed that 9.2% of cattle and 18.2% of beef contain the pathogen.[2] Another recent study has estimated that the Gram-negative bacteria is present in up to 16% of North American cattle.[3] In a 2007 study by Stephens et al., Salmonella was isolated from all of the animals sampled, while Escherichia coli O157:H7 was only isolated from 42.5% of the animals.[4] Notably, 94% of oral cavity samples, 94% of hock samples, 88% of perineum samples, 86% of… [read post]