Search for: "M.D. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Fla. 1990).Indiana: Phelps v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Little, No. 3:06-1206, 2007 WL2821230 (M.D. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
A state court said no. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Indiana Peters v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
